Da I Siding With The Mages As A Warrior

The inquisitor is always seen wielding a sword even the ceremonial sword.

Da i siding with the mages as a warrior.

In inquisition you are put in a place where you decide whether to have the mages or templars join the inquisition. At this point you have a choice to make. In origins it was more minor. Wrong even though i end up siding with the mages 99 of the time anyway.

Blackwall commenting on the decision to side with the rebel mages after completing the quest. Whoever you do not. In the 2nd game the decision was everywhere and everything exploded to the mage rebellion. Siding with the mages leads you on a quest that involves meeting dorian one of the companion units and a plot that.

Templars versus mages is a major decision thrown on the player throughout the series. For a first run i have to recommend the mages. Hawke is obviously a mage in lore wise because warrior and rogue don t really fit the story. I dont remmeber it was all a bit list of spam approval and.

It s fairly easy to rp a hawke that sees siding with the mages as starting a continental wide war and siding with the templars as bloody de escalation. So hawke being a mage obviously is set in stone. That said i somewhat like not having a particular tie to one side or the other as i feel it lets my character think for themselves about right vs. You re standing for order in the hopes that more death can be avoided later on.

Gear wise uh i dont think its any different. This is actually my canon hawke and he s a goody two shoes blue personality. Magic is cool in da and gives a more personal tie to the story. The helm of the inquisitor is meant for a warrior.

It s kirkwall or the world.